My Only Question about the 9/11 Narrative: Is it True â€“ or False? The person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, is like a linchpin in the whole sordid saga of 9/11. Either he is who they say he is, or he is not. Likewise, by extension, either the official 9/11 saga is true â€“ or it is false. This is much more than an academic exercise. This is nothing less than the most important historical and political question of our time. If the official narrative about 9/11 is true, why has the government failed to prove or prosecute their case after more than 16 years? Why has there been no criminal investigation? Why was crucial evidence from the World Trade Center destroyed starting on the first day? If, on the other hand, the official story is false, it means we have been deceived from the very beginning and have been tricked into fighting numerous wars across the Middle East under the pretext of waging the Global War on Terror. According to President Trump, these wars have cost the U.S. some $7 trillion in 17 years. Read the article:
Damien Parsons: The NIST report is a fantasy. They wont release the computer model that their hogwash is based on because of National Security. They dont want to give the Terrorists any ideas. Pretty sure that anyone who supposedly planned and executed an event like this has a pretty good idea. If the Model was made public, it would allow peer review to be accomplished like their first computer model that was rejected by the scientific community.
Oliver Green: The FEMA report gets it right in FEMA publication 403 appendix C, but most people have no idea what eutectic means and why thats so significant.
Waylon Santos: Ofc its a cover up. You can just use your own eyes and some comen sense. Add up all the thing that happened that day and it doesnt make sense. Not at all.
Leon Powell: This guy is a CIA poisoned Patsy-cake. This dude had 0 to do with 9/11.âœŠâ˜®P.S. there are about 116 different variations of the acceptable definition of eutectic, so that only confuses the just woken up or the barely awake.âœŠâ˜®
Antonio Guerrero: you can deduce that they wont bring it to court because they have no proof and they are concerned about giving a chance for real proof to appear in court. They are happy with things just as they are……..no way to get challenged on their version of events, etc…….